Navigation
Search This Blog

Return to KLWines.com

Spirits Journal Podcast Archive

Spirits Journal Twitter Feed

K&L Uncorked Blog

K&L Spirits Tasting Schedule:

Weds from 5 - 6:30 PM

4/23 - Redwood City: Ardbeg Single Malts (w/the chopper!)

2014 K&L Exclusive Scotland Whisky

1988 Littlemill 25 Year Old K&L "Exclusive Malts" Single Barrel Cask Strength Lowland Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1996 Bowmore 16 Year Old Faultline Single Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


Bladnoch "Young" K&L Exclusive Heavily Peated Single Barrel #57 Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


Bladnoch 11 Year Old K&L Exclusive Lightly Peated Single Barrel #303 Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


Bladnoch 23 Year Old K&L Exclusive Single Barrel #1054 Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


Talisker "The Speakeasy" K&L Exclusive Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


2005 Glenrothes 8 Year Old K&L Exclusive "Sovereign" Single Sherry Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1997 Glengoyne 16 Year Old K&L Exclusive "Sovereign" Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


Kilchoman K&L Exclusive Single Bourbon Barrel #172 Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


Kilchoman K&L Exclusive Single Bourbon Barrel #74 Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


2013 K&L Exclusive Scotland Whisky Still Available

1991 Cambus 21 Year Old K&L Exclusive Signatory Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Grain Whisky 750ml IN STOCK NOW!


2002 Bowmore 11 Year Old K&L Exclusive "Exclusive Malts" Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky 750ml IN STOCK NOW!


2005 Island Distillery 7 Year Old K&L Exclusive "Exclusive Malts" Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky 750ml IN STOCK NOW!


2001 Royal Lochnagar 10 Year Old Faultline Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky 750ml IN STOCK NOW!


1995 Glendronach 18 Year Old Single PX Barrel Cask Strength Blended Scotch Whisky 750ml IN STOCK NOW!


1994 Benriach 19 Year Old Single Bourbon Barrel Cask Strength Blended Scotch Whisky 750ml IN STOCK NOW!


1989 Cragganmore 23 Year Old Faultline Single Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1992 Longmorn 21 Year Old Faultline Single Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1987 Mortlach 25 Year Old Faultline Single Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1983 Miltonduff 30 Year Old Faultline Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky 750m IN STOCK NOW!


« Power Rankings - 10/15/10 | Main | WhiskyFest Rundown »
Thursday
Oct142010

Who Gives A S--t About Awards?

Double Gold - San Francisco Spirits Competition.  Silver Medal - World Spirits Festival.  What does this mean and who really cares about these so-called prestigious awards?  It seems that every week when I open a new box of bottles, there is another product with a sticker posted on the front label that cries out, "Look at me!  I'm good!  Now you know how good I really am!"  Somebody asked me earlier today in the store about a whiskey selection and they said, "Well maybe I should get this one because it won the gold medal."  I then showed her the other fifty bottles on the shelf that had also 'won' gold medals and that seemed to put things in perspective for her.

Recently on a more prestigious whiskey blog site, there was a discussion about industry folk getting upset when their product received a low score.  John Hansell himself wrote that not every whiskey can be the best ever - there simply have to be some bad ones out there.  However, it seems that more and more products have found a way to become distinguished on the retail shelf, be it the shiny gold of a medal sticker or a necker tag that displays how points it won from Paul Pacault.  There are enough awards out there for everyone and somehow every major brand has found a way to win one of them.  It seems that in today's high-end liquor store there really are no bad products, or even mediocre ones for that matter.  It's sort of like Who's Who From America's High School Students, but the alcoholic version.  You get a letter telling you how great a young scholar you are and then you pay a fee to be posted in a "prestigious" catalog of pupils, and to top it all off, they charge you for the actual book you appear in.  In return, students get to add it to the long list of acolades on their college resume as a distinguishing mark in their favor.  A mutually beneficial relationship if their ever was one, this formula has been adapted for the liquor and wine world with astonishing efficiency.

Now before I get carried away, I am 100% behind some form of consumer advocacy in the liquor world.  Just this morning I was shopping for SLR cameras and I consulted CNET and Consumer Reports for advice.  The difference between these non-partisan services and the spirits competitions however is night and day.  One offers detailed information about a specific product, pros and cons, positives and negatives, while the other simply states (as broadly as possible): good, very good, best - that's it.  If someone does bother to add a bit more information, that description is carefully censored to cut down to the bare bones necessity - 92 points, nuff said. 

I could probably write about ten pages of examples to illustrate my point, but this is a blog and blogs are made for quick, succinct updates that can be read in a few minutes.  Let me say this and I'll leave it at that: medals are meaningless, points even more so.  For every expert out there who loves a product, I'll find you someone who hates it and vice versa.  Expert panels will always exist, but we as retailers need to stop relying on them to sell products because they're ruining this industry and our ability to educate customers.  Whiskies are not trophies.  They should not make you cool for owning one or envious for not owning one.  Whiskies are drinks and they are meant to be enjoyed with friends.  Some are better than others.  Not all whiskies are for everyone.  If it got 97 points and you hate it, don't drink it.  If it got 75 points and you love it, then who gives a shit?  Drink it and move on.  This is supposed to be fun.

-David Driscoll

Reader Comments (3)

Don't leave us hanging, what camera did you choose?

October 16, 2010 | Unregistered Commenteryay area

Didn't. Leaning towards the Nikon D3000 though. :)

October 17, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterDavid D

The last paragraph is spot on.

October 19, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterchris

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>