Navigation
Search This Blog

Return to KLWines.com

Spirits Journal Podcast Archive

Spirits Journal Twitter Feed

K&L Uncorked Blog

K&L Spirits Tasting Schedule:

Weds from 5 - 6:30 PM

9/24 - San Francisco: Monkey 47 w/Christoph Keller!

9/24 - Redwood City: Germain Robin K&L Exclusive Brandy!

2014 K&L Exclusive Scotland Whisky

Kilchoman K&L Exclusive 100% Islay Single Bourbon Barrel #344 Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


Kilchoman K&L Exclusive 100% Islay Single Bourbon Barrel #345 Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1990 Glenfarclas K&L Exclusive Single Malt Whisky PRE-ORDER


Glenfarclas "The Faultline Casks" K&L Exclusive First Fill Oloroso Sherry Casks Single Malt Whisky PRE-ORDER


1997 Bunnahabhain Heavily Peated 16 Year Old K&L Exclusive Chieftain's Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1998 Laphroaig 15 Year Old Signatory K&L Exclusive Single Refill Sherry Butt Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1983 Caol Ila 30 Year Old Signatory K&L Exclusive Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


2002 Bowmore 11 Year Old Signatory K&L Exclusive Single Refill Sherry Hogshead Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW


1992 Bruichladdich 21 Year Old Signatory K&L Exclusive Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1988 Balmenach 25 Year Old Signatory K&L Exclusive Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1997 Benrinnes 17 Year Old Signatory K&L Exclusive Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1997 Dailuaine 16 Year Old Signatory K&L Exclusive Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1995 Glen Elgin 18 Year Old Signatory K&L Exclusive Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1997 Glenlivet 16 Year Old Signatory K&L Exclusive Single Sherry Butt Single Malt Whisky SOLD OUT!!


1981 Glenlivet 32 Year Old Signatory K&L Exclusive Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1996 Bowmore 16 Year Old Faultline Single Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


Bladnoch "Young" K&L Exclusive Heavily Peated Single Barrel #57 Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1997 Glengoyne 16 Year Old K&L Exclusive "Sovereign" Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


Kilchoman K&L Exclusive Single Bourbon Barrel #172 Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


Kilchoman K&L Exclusive Single Bourbon Barrel #74 Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


2013 K&L Exclusive Scotland Whisky Still Available

2005 Island Distillery 7 Year Old K&L Exclusive "Exclusive Malts" Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky 750ml IN STOCK NOW!


2001 Royal Lochnagar 10 Year Old Faultline Single Barrel Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky 750ml IN STOCK NOW!


1995 Glendronach 18 Year Old Single PX Barrel Cask Strength Blended Scotch Whisky 750ml IN STOCK NOW!


1994 Benriach 19 Year Old Single Bourbon Barrel Cask Strength Blended Scotch Whisky 750ml IN STOCK NOW!


1992 Longmorn 21 Year Old Faultline Single Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


1987 Mortlach 25 Year Old Faultline Single Cask Strength Single Malt Whisky IN STOCK NOW!


« Whiskies of the World in SF! Saturday March 26th | Main | Podcast #12 - Bruichladdich's Jim McEwan »
Friday
Mar182011

The Price of Information & The Reactionary Impulse

Blogs are a wonderful service that allow non-professional writers like myself to provide information to internet readers free of charge for the most part.  While I love to write blogs, read blogs, and comment on other blogs regarding food and booze, I'm a newspaper reader when it comes to current events.  There are simply some subjects that require the proper time, pontification, fact gathering, and resources that a only professionally-paid journalist has the time, access, and ability to do.  Personally, I rely on the New York Times every morning to inform me about what's going on in the world.  Recently I switched from a print subscription to a Kindle subscription and so far I am very satifsfied.  The price is very fair, especially compared to the print rate, and I'm not carrying a bunch of dirty paper around with me everywhere I go.  Newspapers have long been giving out their information for free on the internet, but I don't like to read for too long on the computer, so I prefer to pay for the Kindle format.  There are three reasons behind my logic:

1) I don't like to read on backlit screens for more than 10 - 15 minutes

3) I hate all the pop-up advertisements

3) I cannot help but read the knee-jerk comments from other readers and they only raise my blood pressure

The New York Times however, following the lead of a few other periodicals, decided yesterday to begin charging a monthly fee for access to its online site - a move that seems long overdue and more than justified.  Newspapers are not free, so why should the website version be?  If you were to pay for the print version of the Times everyday it would cost you more than $40 a month.  The price per month to read the website is $15.  For viewers who just want to read an article every now and then, one can access 20 free articles every month before having to subscribe. 

Even though the Times is a for-profit business, many readers still could not believe the turn of events.  Foolishly enough, I decided to read their comments (which are now deactivated) and, as fully expected, my morning zen was completely lost.  95% of the commenters were outraged and vowed to never return to the Times webpage - as if they were contributing anything to begin with!  Some accused the publication of a socio-economic bias.  Others pleaded because they could not afford to pay the fee. 

The reactionary impulse from many people in moments of stress or change is anger.  Anger invariably leads to comments or actions that are later regretted or shown to be incorrect after the proper contemplation.  Anger can cloud the mind and prevent us from thinking logically.  Anger can make us look and behave very foolish.  Nonetheless, the internet has provided us with countless opportunities to react immediately after processing information that could anger some readers.  In this case, people felt entitled to their free information regardless of the fact that the Times must pay its employees to gather it.  Rather than consider this fact, most decided to follow their instinctive impulse, their id so to speak, and give the New York Times a piece of their mind, hoping that it would help to show the Times how foolishly they were behaving.  The irony is incredible.

Information is free so long as the provider is willing to provide it as such.  Blogs are free because they are normally wrriten by hobbiests that are grateful for the attention. NPR is free because our tax dollars pay for it.  The New York Times, however, is a service you pay for.  

-David Driscoll

Reader Comments (3)

The free internet's flow of information is slowing down to a pay per view in today's economic trying times.
The NY Times charging for it's content is their right, as you said they pay the wages of their reporters to compile the information.
The Wall StreetJjournal was one of the first to charge for access, and they don't allow any free reading of their content.
The Times allowing a set threshold of free reading before the fee's kick in is very fair. I have never read that many articles on any news sigh

People think if it's on the internet, then they are entitled to view it for free. Time's, .. they are a changin

March 18, 2011 | Unregistered Commentersnakeman

Snake - most of this is the foundation of my number one pet peeve: getting mad about money instead of voting with your dollars. If you don't want to pay for something, then don't. But don't act like the product shouldn't exist because you don't want to pay for it. That's like getting mad because Porsches exist. If you can't afford $15 for the NYT then you also can't afford a Porsche. It's the anger that bothers me. I can't afford a Porsche but I'm not upset that others can. Same analogy goes for expensive whiskies.

March 18, 2011 | Registered CommenterDavid Driscoll

I agree with you 100% on what you just posted.
It's so easy to vote with your wallet, but no they must tell the whole world that they are getting pissed off.

For the record, I not in the income bracket that can afford a Porsche either.

Enjoy the trip to Scotland next week.

March 19, 2011 | Unregistered Commentersnakeman

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>